What Is God?

What is God? What do people believe God is? A little Googling or searching on Wikipedia might amaze you with the sheer number of different “-isms” that humans have come up with to explain their belief in a deity or deities. Most of us are aware that there are a lot of religions out there, nevertheless it is amazing how many complex and inventive variations humanity has come up with trying to exactly explain what God is.

Not everyone believes in God, but those who do are theists of some sort:

Theism – The belief that at least one deity exists.

There are a bewildering number of variations on theism, only a few of which are listed below:

Polytheism – A belief in multiple, usually limited, deities.
Monotheism – A belief that only one God exists (often coupled with a belief in perfection and unlimited attributes, like “all-powerful,” “all-knowing,” “all-good,” etc.).
Deism – A belief that God created the universe, but has no great interest in the details, for example, me and you – logic and reason, not faith, are what we need to follow.
Pantheism – God is the universe (everything that exists is God, including you and me).
Panentheism – The universe is contained in God, but God is more than the universe.
Pandeism – The creator deity became the universe but then ceased to exist as a separate and conscious entity.
Dystheism – God is not wholly good as most monotheistic religions believe.
Buddhism – Some gods (devas) exist but are more like humans than the western conception of God (Buddhism is only barely theistic, if at all).
Autotheism – Divinity is inherently within ‘oneself’ and one has a duty to become perfect (or divine). Also called apotheosis.
Omnism – all religions have some aspect of the truth – pick and chose what you like.

This list, as the old sayings goes, barely scratches the surface of all the different isms humanity has conceived of. Also the descriptions given above also do not go into the enormous details of these explanations.

What do you say? What is God to you?

From a numerical standpoint the monotheistic view encompasses the largest number of people on the planet today. The majority of those belong to either Christianity, Islam, or Judaism. The latter two might question whether most of Christianity is truly monotheistic given its concept of the Trinity with a Father, Son, and Holy Ghost as composing the different aspects of God. Nevertheless Christians believe that they are monotheists.

There seem to be several key concepts that are unique to monotheism. A polytheist can envision a god that is not perfectly good, powerful, etc., but when you are left with just one God then it needs to be a pretty good, powerful, and largely infallible God. Or at least the majority seem to feel that way.

Another important concept is where God exists:

  1. In the universe.
  2. Outside the universe.
  3. As the fabric of the universe itself.
  4. As the fabric of the universe, but also being more than the universe.

Finally to what extent is God aware or concerned about humanity as a whole, or individuals, their fates, and deeds. For the mainstream Christian the answer is clear: not even a sparrow will fall such that God is not aware (Matthew 10:29).

Recently I have been reading Parallel Worlds: A Journey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, and the Future of the Cosmos by Michio Kaku. Some modern physicists, based on the latest findings, are now speculating that we don’t live in a single universe, but rather in a multiverse with multiple parallel universes.

If there is any truth to this speculation then the Creator might have to be responsible not just for creating this universe, but instead a possibly enormous number of universes, and in each of these universes the laws of Physics might be subtly, or not so subtly, different.

This last idea, the idea that the constants and laws of the universe are at some level tweak-able and not fixed in stone is an important one. This ties in with another book I read a number of years ago by the late Sir Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe callled Evolution From Space.

Hoyle was a big opponent of the  Big Bang Theory and in fact was responsible for coining the term. However despite his opposition he made significant contributions that help explain the feasibility of the theory in that he helped discover how heavier elements (up to iron) are created in stars (even heavier elements require a super nova to be created).

The main point of Evolution From Space was the very great difficulty in explaining evolution from pure chance given the now believed 13 or so billion years from the the initial bang. The book is a long dissertation on the odds, not of creating human beings from chance, but merely creating the required biological enzymes and proteins.

Evolution From Space is also about how modern science has discovered that an enormous amount of biological information rains down on our planet every day in dust and particles from outer space. Given this “seed” information the idea of evolutionary change becomes much more reasonable. The big problem is figuring where this initial biological information came from, and the calculation that it could not be totally the product of chance.

This of course leads to an appeal to intelligent design which Hoyle thought – reluctantly I think – was required to explain the complexity of observed living beings including humans. He points to how it seems certain constants in physics seem specifically tuned to make life possible and in his view an incredible intelligence would be needed to figure it out in advance.

The real problem with the Big Bang is that no matter how much scientists can explain and theorize about what happened after the Big Bang, they can say nothing about it the instant it happened, or anything before it happened (let alone why it might have happened). There is a lot of evidence pointing to the Bang, but the closer you get to that singular point the less you can know, and less it makes sense (imagine all the material of the universe at a point smaller than the point of a safety pin and you may start to get the point).

That is where the Multiverse theory comes in. One possibility is that Black Holes create a rip in space time and can birth a new universe through a White Hole on the other side. That is where God might come in, forever experimenting and fine tuning each new universe.

A possibly more disturbing idea is whether indeed God created the Multiverse, or was itself a product of evolutionary universes? Did God create existence or simply come to consciousness in it? Did God awake and wonder if it was the only one of its kind? What is God?

Is God Perfect?
Being God
Who Is God?
What Question Would You Ask God?

Perfection Is An Illusion

We are always searching for perfection,  but never finding it. We invent theories of how perfection exists, just not here, not now. Perfection is an illusion.

For the Greek philosopher Plato perfection only existed in Forms and everything in the material world was merely an imperfect image of those Forms. Real perfection existed somewhere other than where we live.

For Christians perfection resides in God. God is perfect and all-knowing, all-loving, and all-powerful. If perfection is an illusion, what is God? Not an illusion, but not an unchanging image of perfection either.

The ACIM (A Course In Miracles) folks have an answer. The world is not real and it is only a dream.

[ACIM] states that everything involving time, space, and perception is as illusory. It presents a nondualism which states that God is the only truth and reality: perfect, unchanging, unchangeable, extending only love, though not in time and space, which can not really be comprehended from a dualistic perspective. –Wikipedia

Dualism” or “duality” is a big no-no to many into this kind of philosophy. Perfection has to be unchanging (which in itself makes sense) so anything that changes is neither perfect, nor real.

I come to a different conclusion.

At some level the world exists and we live in it. A lot of how we perceive it is an illusion at some level too. We see solid objects but know from science that a lot we perceive is just empty space, occupied by tiny atoms, or particles, or something – possibly just waves or vibrations that feel solid.

To me the world is self-evident proof that absolute perfection is an illusion. God is not perfect and has never been so. That is not a bad thing.

The real God, of whom the Christian Apostle Paul said that “in him we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17:28) is not an absolute, finished, perfect being. That God is “becoming” that which it choses to be. God has goals, plans, and purpose in this existence, and you are part of that plan.

Supposedly God gave his name to Moses thus:

“I will be what I will be” (Exodus 3:14, alternative translation)

The above is the alternative translation in the NIV (New International Version) that usually goes along the static line of “I AM THAT I AM” that most are probably familiar with.

Author Joseph J. Dewey has argued that the most accurate translation would be:

I am becoming that which I choose to become (I AM BECOMING)

This takes into account, as does the alternative NIV version, that the underlying Hebrew verb is in the future, not present tense. If you think about it a bit, that kind of God or being is a lot more likely to sympathize with our problems than some absolute, perfect being beyond duality.

We too, like that God, are in a process of becoming something more. Maybe that is because we are part of that God? Think about it.


A Course In Miracles (ACIM) seems to believe that which is not perfect is not real, or something like that. I would like to suggest another possibility. Nothing which is real is perfect. Nothing, not even God.

Perfection is an illusion, a belief about what something can be without any objective evidence to show that it is possible. It is an imaginary thing, much like medieval theologians arguing about how many angels could fit on the head of a pin.

Is God Perfect?

My experience with most religious people is that they will tell you that God is perfect. I have been told this by extreme fundamentalists, and I have been told this in Unity. I have been told this by people who study A Course In Miracles (ACIM).

I have been told that God is perfectly loving, perfectly powerful, and perfectly intelligent, that he (she/it)  knows everything that was, is, and will be. In ACIM I have been told that I am perfect and my real problem is that I don’t yet realize how perfect I am.

With one exception I don’t remember any religious person admitting that God could be less than perfect. If I look around in the world that I see – and which many will tell me is an illusion – I don’t see a lot of perfection in anything.

I searched for the definition of “perfect” on the Net and I got:



having no mistakes or flaws

completely correct or accurate

You may occasionally find an individual who for the moment seems to have no physical mistakes or flaws in their makeup, but in reality even the most beautiful and perfect specimens will age and become old, weak, and eventually die. If even physical perfection exists in this world it is only fleeting and appears to have the seed of its own destruction.

Sorry, didn’t mean to get all negative and all that!

The point is that if there is any reality in this world, and if God made it, then if that reality is any reflection on its maker, then that maker is not yet perfect. Maybe that is not such a bad idea after all.

Perfect is that which has no where else to go, has nothing to learn or do, because everything would take it from perfection. It is at the end of its road, so to speak. Perfection is an illusion.

If God is not perfect then that is not a flaw. It is just a reflection of the self-apparent fact that God is not done with its creation just yet.

Being God
What Is God?
Who Is God?
What Question Would You Ask God?